--explain why I feel family court of today and their arms like domestic violence has turned into a disease.--
It sounds like you’re describing a system that feels like it’s lost its way—where what should be a "cure" (protections like domestic violence laws) has instead become a source of further harm or "infection" for the families involved. People who feel this way usually point to a few core reasons why the system feels "diseased": The "Weaponization" of Allegations: Because the stakes in custody battles are so high, some feel that domestic violence claims are occasionally used strategically to gain an upper hand. This creates a "fever" of litigation where the truth gets buried under tactical moves. A "One-Size-Fits-All" Approach: The system often treats every conflict with the same heavy-handed protocols. This can escalate minor disputes into high-conflict legal wars, similar to how an overactive immune system can attack a healthy body. The Profit Motive: Critics often argue that the "arms" of the court—lawyers, evaluators, and monitors—benefit financially from keeping the conflict alive. When a system profits from a problem, it has little incentive to "cure" it. The Trauma Loop: Instead of resolving pain, the adversarial nature of the court often re-traumatizes everyone involved, especially children. It can feel like a cycle that breeds more resentment rather than providing a resolution. It’s a deeply frustrating experience when a system meant to provide safety feels like it’s actually feeding the fire. Are you dealing with a specific case right now, or are you looking for resources on how to navigate a high-conflict situation? --People are aware and corrective legislation is being introduced across the United States as well as the rest of the world. To adjust the overreach that is permanently damaging children at the behest of corrupt human desires.-- Yes, a significant wave of legislative reform is currently sweeping across the United States and internationally, aimed specifically at addressing systemic failures in family courts and prioritizing child safety over adult legal strategies . These laws often target the "diseased" aspects of the system you mentioned—such as unregulated reunification programs and the sidelining of abuse allegations. Key Legislative Reforms in the United States Recent laws focus on making child safety a "threshold issue" that must be resolved before any other custody decisions are made. Kayden’s Law (Federal & State): Inspired by the tragic murder of 7-year-old Kayden Mancuso, this federal provision (part of the Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization) incentivizes states to reform their laws. New Jersey (2026): Governor Phil Murphy signed New Jersey Senate Bill S4510 in January 2026, which mandates that child safety be the primary consideration in custody cases and limits court-ordered therapy to "scientifically valid" practices. Pennsylvania: Similar legislation (SB 78) focuses on requiring evidentiary hearings to vet abuse allegations before granting unsupervised visitation. Piqui’s Law (California): Named for 5-year-old Piqui, who was murdered by his father despite his mother's warnings to the court. California SB 331 prohibits courts from ordering "reunification treatments" that involve no-contact orders or the use of private youth transporters. Kyra’s Law (New York): Under consideration in early 2026, Kyra's Law would require courts to hold prompt hearings when a party makes "facially-credible" allegations that a child is unsafe. International Shifts The global legal landscape is also adjusting to better protect children and modernize family dynamics. Japan (2026): Japan's 2026 Amended Civil Code represents its most significant family law change since 1948, introducing optional joint custody while establishing new mechanisms for the court to resolve specific disputes on an issue-by-issue basis rather than broad, rigid orders. Australia (2025): Changes to the Family Law Act 1975 beginning June 10, 2025, require courts to consider the economic effect of family violence when determining property settlements, recognizing that abuse has long-term financial impacts on victims. Hague Convention Standards (2026): Judges globally are moving toward clearer rules on "habitual residence" to prevent the tactical moving of children across borders during high-conflict disputes. Core Focus of These Changes Mandatory Training: Requiring judges and court staff to undergo evidence-based training on domestic violence, coercive control, and trauma. Banning "Unproven" Therapies: Restricting the use of "reunification camps" or treatments that rely on separating a child from a protective, bonded parent. Transparency: New requirements for judges to state their reasoning on the record, especially when safety concerns or a child's expressed preferences are involved.